Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Board eliminates facilities fee

Two other controversial student fees totaling $135 stay approved

Published: Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 01:10

Students will likely not have to pay a proposed $30 for classroom improvements after a committee voted down the fee last week, reversing an earlier recommendation.

The teaching facilities fee, which would have paid for improvements such as new paint and ceiling tiles, would have gone into effect next year. The committee first passed the fee at a Sept. 17 meeting after Student Government Association President Steve Glickman — who said he opposed the fee — left early after what the committee's chair called a "misunderstanding." The reversal was made during a closed meeting, and students said they were told to keep parts of the meeting confidential.

The fee was one of three controversial new fees passed at the mid-September meeting to fund programs normally paid for using tuition dollars and state appropriations. The committee opted not to reconsider the other two new fees, which total $135. As a result, mandatory student fees may increase by nearly $200 next year after climbing just $84.50 over the past two years.

Those who opposed the additional fees said the increase would put an extra burden on cash-strapped students and that it is inappropriate to fund the programs through student fees. Glickman, who also missed votes on the other two fees at the first meeting, said he was unhappy they were not reconsidered.

"If I were [Gov. Martin] O'Malley's office, I'd be up in arms. ... This is exactly what he was trying to prevent [with a tuition freeze]," Glickman said.

There was an unsuccessful motion to reconsider at least one other fee, said SGA Senior Vice President and committee member Elliott Morris, but he did not think there would have been enough backing to defeat the fee.

The 13-person Committee for the Review of Student Fees tied on the teaching facilities fee when it first considered it weeks ago, and Vice President of Administrative Affairs Ann Wylie, the committee's chair, broke the tie in favor of the fee. All five students present at the meeting opposed the fee, but SGA President Steve Glickman had already left to catch a flight home to Buffalo, N.Y., for Rosh Hashanah.

Owing to her inexperience chairing the committee, Wylie said she had given Glickman the impression the meeting would end at 7:30 p.m. and be continued another day. Instead the meeting lasted until after 9 p.m., during which time the committee passed the new fees.
Administrators decided to reconvene the meeting to allow everyone to voice their opinions, Wylie said last month.

Other new fees would require students to pay $100 to fund the library's collections budget and to build a study area in McKeldin Library and $35 to allow administrators to reduce the amount of tuition money used to pay for the Health Center.

Graduate Student Government President Anu Kothari, a committee member, said she was pleased the teaching facilities fee was defeated but frustrated with what she considered to be the poor record keeping and lack of transparency associated with the process. The committee's deliberations are closed to the public.

"It's fine if they would just come out and say these meetings are not meant to be transparent, so they're not going to be transparent, so you shouldn't expect transparency," she said. "The honest truth is they're not transparent."

Morris said students should be able to observe the process, if not in person then through a transcript or recording.

"Students have a right to be involved in the way the decisions that affect their education are made," he said.

The committee is an advisory body. The final approval of student fees comes from the Board of Regents, a 17-member panel of gubernatorial appointees who oversee the university system.

cox at umdbk dot com, openchowski at umdbk dot com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Thu Oct 15 2009 09:16
The pocket change is our tuition and fees. We pay nothing compared to other schools. I'll take this minimal fee increase over a loss of library resources and I'm asking for a tuition hike if it will help fund cut programs and support like GAships and student employment.
Do students realize what our staff is going through to keep the tuition and fees down at this ridiculous level? Talk to people who have been laid off and those (mainly everyone) who has to take furlough to try to save other jobs and keep our tuition and fees so low.
Don't be a bunch of babies and realize that we have a great school, are getting a great education, and are paying basically nothing for it.
Publius
Wed Oct 14 2009 18:31
Flagship on the cheap?

As per the University System of MD website, current fees at other UM institutions:

UM College Park - $1,487
Frostburg State - $1,684
Coppin State - $1,749
Bowie - $1,754
Salisbury - $1,804
U of Baltimore - $1,846
UM Eastern Shore - $1,970
Towson - $2,238
UMBC - $2,388

This is a research 1 university, people. If you want a poorer education with higher fees, transfer.

And just to put things in perspective, in California, they saw a $662 increase at the start of fall, will see another $558 in January, and another $1,956 next fall (as per September 17 LA Times).

WTF are we complaining about!?!

Save your breath for the elimination/consolidation of entire programs that the recent round of budget cuts have made inevitable :P

Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 15:46
isn't tuition a fee?
Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 15:42
its amazing to me that there is this big push to keep kids in maryland and we are all encouraged to donate pocket change etc... yet these ridiculous and arbitrary fees keep going up and getting tacked on, i think there needs to be a fee to investigate the fees and then a fee to investigate the text book price racket.
Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 14:28
How did you manage to come up with the ridiculous idea that the government said people could have free healthcare? The government has never said anything like that.
Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 11:57
I don't know how it is at the University of Maryland, but I know that elsewhere students must pay student fees even if their tuition is fully covered by scholarships, assistantships, etc. So, increasing fees to decrease tuition means that more students will actually have to pay for it (instead of having the state or whoever pay for it).
Your name
Wed Oct 14 2009 09:10
"...and $35 to allow administrators to reduce the amount of tuition money used to pay for the Health Center."

HA! So, they're going to reduce the amount of "tuition money" used, and instead pay for it out of "student fees?" WTF is the difference?! It all comes from the students anyway. This reminds me of the government telling me I can have free healthcare, it'll just be paid for with taxes.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In