Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Concerns about student renters dominate forums

City council candidates hear residents’ complaints

Published: Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 01:10

The abundance of student rental homes in College Park dominated the discussion at recent forums for City Council candidates in Districts 2 and 4 as attendees bemoaned the transformation of their neighborhoods.

As residents complained about late-night parties and overcrowded, poorly maintained properties  at Thursday's District 2 forum in Berwyn and a District 4 forum Sunday in College Park Woods, candidates pledged more student outreach and stricter noise code enforcement.

But many candidates insisted problematic landlords are more of a worry than individual student renters, making it the city's responsibility to minimize the desirability of renting out homes in College Park.

"We don't want to drive all the students out of the neighborhoods, but we do want to change the market to not make it so financially lucrative to have a rental property," unopposed mayoral candidate Andy Fellows said at the Berwyn forum. "It's going to destroy single-family home ownership."

District 2 incumbent Jack Perry, who has lived in College Park for four decades and served on the council for two, said he expected to put up with some noise and partying in his neighborhood on football game days as the penalty for living in a college town when he first moved in "800 years ago." He recalled knowing the families who lived in each house on his street.

But since then, he said, a lack of on-campus housing pushed more students into his community, music players got louder and a drinking age of 21 kept students from legally partying on the campus or at bars.

"It is a changed community: So many houses have turned into rentals, I don't believe the amount of people that drive down or walk down my street. I don't know where they're going, and I don't know who the hell they are," Perry said. "There are so many houses today [in which] I don't have the slightest idea who lives there."

Although most discussion of student rental homes at both forums focused on complaints, some of the candidates also offered proposals to reverse the growing number of off-campus rental homes. 

District 4 candidate Marcus Afzali, a university graduate student, said the city should extend the period in which repeat noise violations lead to higher fines from six months to two years. Last year, District 3 Councilwoman Stephanie Stullich backed off an attempt to increase it to one year after student outcry.

Afzali also said the city should strengthen its rent-control policies, which would both help existing renters and discourage single-family homes from being converted into rentals.

Both incumbents in District 4 — Karen Hampton and Mary Cook — unsuccessfully opposed a rent control measure over the summer.

At Sunday's forum, Hampton proposed making it easier to pull a landlord's license for renting to troublesome students as an alternative to rent control.

Meanwhile, District 2 candidate Bob Weber, a landlord, said the best way to change the makeup of a neighborhood wouldn't be to punish owners who rent out their properties but to provide financial incentives to landlords to sell off their properties to long-term residents.

Many candidates also prioritized increased outreach to students, arguing it could help them better understand city rules and engage them in the community.

Cook said she would seek to expand the city staff to include a "mediator," who would have the role of settling disputes without involving city code enforcement officers and hefty fines.

Jonathan Sachs, the Student Government Association's city council liaison and the only student outside of campus media to attend either forum, said much of the discussion at the District 4 forum took for granted that students are undesirable neighbors — a "completely unfair" generalization.

"I think that the students who make the most noise stick out and become the rule for everyone," Sachs said. "Everyone has good neighbors and bad neighbors, and students are living on their own for the first time, and I think the residents of College Park should give us the benefit of the doubt and help us be good neighbors."

Candidates at the two forums also stressed the issue of public safety. Weber and District 4 candidate Denise Mitchell both recalled living in College Park as children without having to worry about crime, contrasting that with too-frequent burglaries in their neighborhoods today.

Candidates also suggested working with the university to expand the area patrolled by campus police in student-heavy neighborhoods and strengthening volunteer neighborhood watch groups. But unlike in a District 1 forum held earlier this month, no candidate called for adding a police force to the city.

bholt at umdbk dot com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Sun Oct 25 2009 15:42
Well it's not the landlords' fault that students party a lot/play loud music, but it IS the landlord's fault that many of the properties are poorly maintained.

I live in a College Park house and I moved in to shutters falling off/broken doors/old greening paint/etc. Students are not responsible for fixing up "slums" and I think that is a bigger detriment to a neighborhood than noise. If neighbors ask students to keep it down, and if they don't, call the cops a couple times, then the parties and the noise will stop. But poorly maintained yards/houses are very often the fault of the landlord.

I 100% agree that the solution isn't making properties less desirable to rent, it's making landlords keep their house up to code/making strict codes, enforcing noise violations, etc. I think the idea of a mediator is also a good one.

But people complaining that it's not lucrative to rent in college park are CRAZY. You can rent out a horrible house for a huge amount of money, even with the rent controls. Landlords who complain that they don't turn a profit must either have houses located in an undesirable neighborhood (not something rent control will affect) or maintain an undesirable house (also not something that has to do with rent controls). My landlord is charging me 1,000s of dollars more than they could get in any other neighborhood with a house of that size/in that condition.

Franklin's
Tue Oct 20 2009 12:10
"Force the students and landlords to behave. "

The landlords can not and should not control the parties or the noise. Why does the city have the right to fine landlords whenever the students have a party? What is the landlord supposed to do drive by the house everynight and see if its too loud? This is one topic where the city government is way out of line

Your name
Tue Oct 20 2009 11:53
you live in a college town. suck it up or move out
JImbo
Tue Oct 20 2009 09:43
I am a homeowner and have no problem with nearby student occupied homes.

I totally and 100% disagree with Fellows comments:

(**“but we do want to change the market to not make it so financially lucrative to have a rental property,” unopposed mayoral candidate Andy Fellows said at the Berwyn forum. “It’s going to destroy single-family home ownership.”**)

What it is going to do is destroy the *value* of single family homes. Not everyone is planning to live in their current home for the rest of their lives and we would like there to be some kind of market when we go to sell.

What we need most in CP is increased policing and increased code enforcement (including noise). Force the students and landlords to behave. Make the city safe and attractive. Everyone benefits from this.

Mary Washington
Tue Oct 20 2009 07:28
College Park sucks. "We don’t want to drive all the students out of the neighborhoods, but we do want to change the market to not make it so financially lucrative to have a rental property” Umm WTF? Good old government at work. Instead of enforcing the noise violations they are going to destroy an investors livelyhood? What kind of world are we living in?? Whats next, I dont like that there are so many sub shops in the city so we are going to tax sub shops at a much higher rate so that they will go away. I wish I could sell my investement property in College Park but the truth is that there are no more investors because of the councils irresponsible and unfair behavior
Barney Rubble
Tue Oct 20 2009 07:19
So let me get this straight, its the landlords fault that students are playing loud music and trashing their neighborhood? If I could sell my rental I would do it in a second. Right now nobody wants to buy a house in College Park because they know they will not be able to turn a profit renting it and have to deal with all of the rules and regulations of the CP council who want to "change the market to not make it so financially lucrative to have a rental property" I hate College Park. Good luck to all of the home owners when you try to sell your house. There wont be a long list of investors waiting to pick up your property anymore. The city will just turn into another shithole like riverdale, hyattsville, new carrollton, greenbelt, etc.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In