Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Employees will have up to ten furlough days

Campus will close for four days; low-wage employees not excepted

Published: Monday, September 21, 2009

Updated: Monday, September 21, 2009 00:09

Furlough days

  • 2 days: $29,999 and under
  • 3 days: $30,000-$49,999
  • 4 days: $50,000-$69,999
  • 5 days: $70,000-$89,999
  • 6 days: $90,000-$114,999
  • 7 days: $115,000-$139,999
  • 8 days: $140,000-$169,999
  • 9 days: $170,000-$199,999
  • 10 days: $200,000+

Exempt employees

  • 100 percent grant-funded employees
  • Student hourly employees
  • Graduate assistants
  • H1-B visa holders
  • Nonexempt, Contingent 1 staff
  • Exempt, Contingent 1 staff
  • Hourly faculty
  • Non-regular, non-tenured faculty
  • Faculty and staff appointed on or after Feb. 1, 2010

The campus will close for four days this academic year and even the lowest-paid university employees will be forced to take two unpaid days off under a furlough plan released this weekend.

The plan, which was released by university President Dan Mote and Director of Human Resources Dale Anderson, is necessary to save a state-mandated $10.2 million in employee salary costs. The university and state have been battered by a declining economy and shrinking budgets. The number of days employees will be furloughed is based on a sliding scale, with the highest-salaried employees — those making $200,000 or more — forced to take 10 days off.

"We all agree that furloughs are tough and that they are especially difficult for some members of our community," Mote wrote in a campus-wide e-mail announcing the plan sent Saturday. "The guiding principle of our furlough plan is equity and fairness for campus employees, while satisfying operational mandates covering our educational mission. What is equitable and fair is in the eye of the beholder."

While graduate assistants, hourly-paid student employees, grant-funded employees and several other groups of staff won't have their pay reduced, lower-paid employees will. The union representing the campus's lower paid workers, the university chapter of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, had pushed for lower-paid employees to be exempt from furloughs. But even those making less than $30,000 will have to take two days off.

"We didn't get what we wanted as far as the lowest-paid workers, and we aren't happy with that," said Craig Newman, the secretary-treasurer of the AFSCME Local 1072.

Vice President for Administrative Affairs Ann Wylie said the administration had little choice, and pointed out the lowest-paid state employees at other agencies were furloughed for three days.

"We felt that everyone should be furloughed," she said. "Everyone in the state government was furloughed ... We just felt that this was a huge problem, financial problem and everyone should share the burden."

Newman pointed to other concessions the union received during negotiations: The highest level for furloughs was set at $200,000 instead of $250,000 and that the salary reductions will be spread out over several paychecks instead of one. This, Newman said, means most of AFSCME's members will lose no more than two hours of gross pay per paycheck. Spreading out the salary reductions means "it's still something that you can manage in a budget in comparison to the elimination of a whole day," he said.

The campus will shut down for two separate two-day periods, once right before Christmas — Dec. 23 and 24 — and once during spring break — March 17 and 18. On the days the campus shuts down, the university will operate like it does on snow day — most administrators and professors will stay home, but some services, like University Police, will continue working. Administrators and University Senate Executive Committee members agreed shutting down the campus for brief periods of time when classes are out of session will help preserve the university's educational mission.

Further cuts to the university budget are likely, after Gov. Martin O'Malley announced last week there is a $300 million remaining deficit for this year's state budget and a projected $2 billion one for next year. Newman said the union is prepared to fight to prevent further financial harm to their members.

"We're fairly clear these budgets aren't cut to the bone," Newman said of university departments. "We're tired of seeing first-class hotels and people having BlackBerrys when they don't need them when they're telling campus human resources they're cut to the bone."

robillard@umdbk.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Your name
Thu Sep 24 2009 12:22
The university seems to have decided to solve its budget problems using the 'death by a thousand cuts' method.
They continue to build new and unnecessary buildings. They continue to hire more and more people. The way they are running the place is just not sustainable.

The people who will suffer the most are those who can least afford it and who are least responsible for the budget problems.

Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 15:48
The unions is week. President Mote don't like them. Nothing can happen.
Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 15:47
Newman said the union is prepared to fight to prevent further financial harm to their members.

What can the union do when peoples are afraid of getting fired not really much.

Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 13:52
@I Live in a BLUE State - "And the repercussions of Bush's white house will trickle down and continue on for many years to come. He did a lot of damage in those 8 years. It will take probably at least 10 to fix them."

Seriously? How long are you going to continue blaming every single thing on Bush? It's tired and it's pathetic. And I'm betting you couldn't even offer any specifics about what Bush actually did that was so terrible and that'll take "10 years" to fix.

I live in a BLUE State
Tue Sep 22 2009 13:23
oh goodie what we need on this campus is MORE corporate sponsorship.

You can't buy a COKE on campus.

The Byrd stadium is now the Capital One Field or the Comcast Center. I'm waiting for the Taco Bell Food Court.

or the Exxon Shuttle busses.

Can't blame O'Malley either. It took a few years to screw all this up. And the repercussions of Bush's white house will trickle down and continue on for many years to come. He did a lot of damage in those 8 years. It will take probably at least 10 to fix them.

Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 12:31
Who is going to fix the waste?
Not Mote.
Not Ann Wylie who felt strongly that EVERYONE should be furloughed.
Steve
Tue Sep 22 2009 12:22
Yeah, vote Erlich back into office so that he can jack up tuition ridiculously. Because the best way to fix a budget problem is to make people give you more money, not to fix the actual waste at the University.
Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 12:06
Any employee who supports O'Malley when he runs for re-election is a fool.
Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 12:05
Kathie says: "We all know that things aren't always equitable but it seems like the furloughs were distributed to hit the lowest-paid people the hardest."

Mote says: “The guiding principle of our furlough plan is equity and fairness for campus employees, while satisfying operational mandates covering our educational mission. What is equitable and fair is in the eye of the beholder.”

Do you think that anyone making less than $100,000 had anything to do with the furlough plan?
HINT: NO. Let them eat cake.

Andy
Tue Sep 22 2009 11:48
To "Your Name" from Mon Sep 21 2009 18:20:

EXACTLY. The point is that what he makes in one day is a LOT of money, and even if you asked him to give up half of his salary, he'd still have more than enough money to "get by." If he can ask people who make less than $30,000 to give up a certain amount of their money, when they're probably struggling as-is, and they haven't been able to get raises or COLA in over a year, then he can give up some of his ridiculously high salary. Bonus points to anyone who can tell me what Dr. Mote actually does - or any public university president for that matter - that warrants nearly a half million dollar salary in the first place.

Kathie
Tue Sep 22 2009 11:30
President Mote was quoted as saying "this year's plan will likely be similar, but the amount of days taken will probably double. The highest-paid employees could have 10 furlough days." What actually happened looks a little different to me. I make less than $35,000 and my furlough days tripled – a 200% increase. Some of my coworkers who make less than $30,000 were "spared" last time but they're being hit with two days. Two days worth of pay when you're already struggling to make ends meet is a terrible burden. We all know that things aren't always equitable but it seems like the furloughs were distributed to hit the lowest-paid people the hardest. IN FY09, the "highest-paid employees" were those who made $90,000 and above but the FY10 plan divided this group into five separate tiers so that only those who make over $200,000 actually received double the furlough. In fact, those making $90,000 to $199,999 will get between one and four additional days (that’s a 20% increase for those who make between $90K and $115K) but NONE of them will see a doubling of their furlough days.
Your name
Tue Sep 22 2009 11:17
“The guiding principle of our furlough plan is equity and fairness for campus employees, while satisfying operational mandates covering our educational mission. What is equitable and fair is in the eye of the beholder.”

Does Mote read what he writes??? 'Equity and fairness' ? And then he says it's in the 'eye of the beholder' !!
And the beholder is Mote himself and all of his assistants with their six-figure salaries.

O Madison
Mon Sep 21 2009 20:20
The light has burned out. Time to get a new fridge.
Your name
Mon Sep 21 2009 19:51
Nice that we have such a "liberal" University - the Students and Faculty worship Obama but when it comes to paying the people who do the real work, forget it. Read the Salary Guide, full of 6-figure numbers who sit on their ass, while the people who do the real work don't make enough to get by. And no COLA or merit raises and unpaid days off.
Your name
Mon Sep 21 2009 18:20
"What do you want, for one man to not work for 25 days, and lose 10% of his expected pay? He would be better off going to work somewhere else. "

Well, Mote makes about $464,000 a year. Do you think he might be able to absorb a pay cut better than the employees making $30,000 a year? Ten percent of Mote's pay is $46,400. He would still have $417,600 left to live on. Do you think he can make it on that much?

Your name
Mon Sep 21 2009 14:39
to the other "your name" please do some math and consider the following; a person making $200k is making 10x as much as a person making $20k and is taking a furlough hit in raw dollars that is 50x as much as the other person and a person making $400k is taking a furlough hit in raw dollars that is 100x as the person making $20k
Your Name
Mon Sep 21 2009 14:34
To the person telling Mote to play fair, I don't see how you can ask Dr. Mote to give up additional furlough days himself. At some point you have to cap the number of days work isn't getting done, and a percentage of pay given up. 10 days and 3.8% of a man's salary is plenty. What do you want, for one man to not work for 25 days, and lose 10% of his expected pay? He would be better off going to work somewhere else.

Personally, I think the anger should be at the typically shady Governor who has mandated the money be taken from employees salaries. Are the state employees solely responsible for fallen property and sales taxes? No, however, they have to pay for them. Why do this rather than create a temporary tax increase to state residents, which could be refunded when a surplus is reached? Because the Governor would rather anger 70 thousand state employed voters than 4 million voting state residents upon hearing any mention of tax increase, even if temporary, even if it saves jobs, and the amount of money given up is much less per person.

DMM
Mon Sep 21 2009 13:57
Tons of other schools have a pre-final break. Since we are going to have them, just use furlough days to bring that to Maryland.
Your name
Mon Sep 21 2009 12:19
Good article. It's too bad that yet again Dr. Mote seems to have ignored the fact that many people on this campus, including him, make well over $200,000 (I think he was $464,000-ish last time I checked). How come they aren't taking proportionately more furlough days? The amount those people make in a day is close to what some of the lower-paid employees make in a week, and they're only taking 8 more days than them? Someone who makes $300,000 makes ten times as much as someone who makes $30,000, but only takes 7 more furlough days. How is that even close to equitable in the eye of any beholder who can do simple arithmetic? Play fair, Mr. President.
Your name
Mon Sep 21 2009 12:10
Cleary Sandy needs some more education. Maybe some reading comprehension classes....

Also, tuition that is paid by students/parents covers less than half of the cost to run the University. The state and corporate sponsors cover the rest.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In