Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Opposition to financial aid reform ramps up

Industry claims 35K jobs would be lost

Published: Monday, September 28, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 01:09

After months of smooth sailing, student loan reform is entering stormy waters.

Earlier this month, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed legislation that would effectively overhaul federal student loans by eliminating subsidies to banks and placing the industry firmly in the federal government's control. But the bill could face stronger opposition in the Senate, where Republicans could ally with conservative Democrats to block its passage. 

Advocates said the bill, which is being called the biggest overhaul of student loans in 35 years, eliminates an unnecessary middle man by dissolving the Federal Family Education Loan program, which provides three-quarters of all federal loans by subsidizing ones given by private lenders. Instead, the Department of Education would loan the money directly to students. If passed, the bill would save the government $87 billion. 

"This plan would end the billions upon billions of dollars in unwarranted subsidies that we hand out to banks and financial institutions — money that doesn't do anything to make your loans any cheaper," President Barack Obama said to students during a health-care rally in the Comcast Center earlier this month. "Instead we're going to use that money to guarantee access to low-cost loans no matter what the economy looks like."

 But conservative opponents of the legislation said the plan would amount to another government takeover and could kill thousands of jobs. The loan industry claims 35,000 jobs would be lost, according to TIME magazine.

"I think the underlying bill is flawed. I think it is a rush to a government takeover; it is going to add to our deficit," Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.), the top Republican on the House's education committee, said during debate on the House floor. "Let's take advantage of the private sector; let's see if there is a way that we can strengthen it and encourage it ... and look at the program before we push precipitously the entire industry into the hands of the government."

All but six Republicans voted against the bill in the House, and similar solidarity could be expected in the Senate, where five Democrats have already said they will vote against the bill. However, the House passed the bill using a technique called reconciliation, meaning it can't be filibustered.

The $87 billion saved will instead expand other federal aid programs and provide $50 million to the Department of Education, intended to help colleges make the transition. The House bill invests $40 billion to increase the maximum annual Pell Grant award — a federal grant that provides need-based aid to help low-income students pay for college and does not have to be repaid by recipients — from its current value of $5,350 to $5,550 in 2010 and $6,900 by 2019. 

"With student debt at record levels and loan default rates on the rise, the House just passed legislation that will provide real annual increases in student grant aid, reducing the need to borrow," said Lauren Asher, president of the Institute for College Access and Success. 

Beginning in 2011, the grant will be linked to match rising costs-of-living by linking it to the Consumer Price Index — a measure of inflation used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

And the need for financial aid is growing.

New figures from the U.S. Department of Education show that the total amount of money borrowed by students and received by universities in the 2008-2009 academic year increased by about 25 percent from the year before — totaling about $75 billion.

"Making all federal loans through the Direct Loan program will also make it easy for borrowers to distinguish federal student loans from risky private loans," Asher said. "This bill is a win for students and families."

The Senate's version of the legislation hasn't been written yet. But objections could also be raised to provisions in the House bill that would make spending on Pell grants mandatory and limit Congressional control over the program.

If the student financial aid bill is approved by the Senate, it will land on Obama's desk. The president has been a long-time supporter of reforming the federal financial aid system and is expected to sign the bill into law.

"We will take this battle for America's students and America's working families to the Senate," Obama said. "And then I intend to sign this bill into law. Because that's the change you worked for.  That's the change you voted for. "

mlang@umdbk.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

Greling Jackson
Sat Oct 17 2009 12:09
Well, "Student Aid Professional", I'm sure you definitely know what you're talking about. I can almost guarantee with a 95% chance that you work for Sallie Mae's PR department and are in a state of constant panic, because your rip-off sub-prime loan industry that turned getting a degree into getting a lifetime mortgage is finally having the wind taken out of it. You take taxpayer money and lend it out to students, pocket the outrageous profits, and assume no risk if the students default. If you're truly opposed to the government interfering with the "free market", then you should be in support of getting rid of these socialist subsidies all together. No more welfare for Wall Street.

And "Still Looking for a New Job", that 6.8% market rate is a dream rate compared to what students are being charged by private lenders like Sallie Mae. Try 18.9% variable plus 3% origination fees. Oh, and you can't declare bankrupt like you can with a mortgage or credit card. This scary debt will follow you to the grave. So why do they charge such outrageous interest if there's no risk by law? Because they can and because Sallie Mae execs accept only the best corporate jets.

Still Looking for a New Job
Thu Oct 1 2009 05:01
Very well stated "Student Aid Professional". I am, or was a student aid professional for over 20 years and lost my job due to what the government calls excess interest. This is completely bogus. The student pays 6.8% interest but if the market rate is less than 6.8% the difference is paid to the government, not to the student. Where is the outrage?
Student Aid Professional
Wed Sep 30 2009 10:43
Only in Washington can it sound like a great idea to take money from one American, lend it to another and make money (interest) off of him. This subsidy to banks as it is called, is not a reality in the current state of the economy. The department of education subsidizes the student by paying the interest on his loan will he is in school. Under the current formula using the excess interest rules, banks are actually paying money back to the government, the opposite of what is commonly spouted by politicians wanting to take over yet another part of the private economy. People in the media should really get up to speed on how the Student Aid System works instead of just spitting back out what they are told by other people who have agendas or don't know themselves what they are talking about.
Full Monty Hall
Tue Sep 29 2009 07:06
How can Asher say this is a win-win for families who borrow could have their interest rates reduced by $87 billion, but instead will be used to fund Pell Grants, community colleges, elementary schools and deficit reduction? If Republicans tried thius, Asher would be the first to yell, Raid on Student Aid.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In