College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Police officer presents different take on drug prohibition

33-year law enforcement veteran argues for legalization of narcotics at SSDP event

By Kara Estelle

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Legalize2

Charlie DeBoyace for The Diamondback

Neill Franklin of LEAP addresses students.

About 50 people attended a presentation last night to witness something relatively unheard of: someone involved in law enforcement advocating legalizing drugs.

Neill Franklin, who has been involved in various aspects of law enforcement for 33 years, spoke last night at a “Cop Says Legalize Drugs” presentation in the Stamp Student Union, advocating the legalization of all drugs — everything from heroin to marijuana — which would effectively put an end to the war on drugs.

Franklin spoke on behalf of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition — an international non-profit organization that, according to its website, is made up of current and former members of law enforcement who support government drug regulation rather than prohibition.

In his presentation, Franklin said the goal of the war on drugs is to lower the incidence of death, disease, crime and addiction that results from substance abuse. He said his organization has the same goals, but thinks those ends should be reached by legalizing all drugs.

Irina Alexander, a junior criminology and criminal justice major and president of Students for Sensible Drug Policy, said Franklin provided a unique perspective on the issue of drug reform. She said she thinks Franklin is different because he is advocating legalizing drugs while still involved in law enforcement, whereas many other speakers from the organization are retired officers.

Alexander said when she passed out flyers for the event, some students did not believe a police officer was speaking in favor of legalizing drugs. 

“I’ve been to previous events, but I’m very interested in what this guy has to say because this is the first time I’ve heard someone in law enforcement who wants to legalize drugs,” sophomore physics major Cyrus Fitch said.

Franklin’s law enforcement background seemed to be what drew the majority of students to the event.

“I wanted to hear what the police officer had to say, because it’s close to what I’m dealing with at home. I have a lot of family incarcerated because of drugs,” junior English language and literature major Kiara Somerville said. “I find it odd that a police officer is against putting people in jail for drugs, so I just wanted to hear what’s going on.”

“I love it,” sophomore chemical engineering and mathematics major David Royer added. “He’s definitely for the right cause and has the right mindset.”

The presentation ended with a question-and-answer session between Franklin and students in which students asked Franklin about his law enforcement background and tested the limits of his radical position.

One student asked Franklin how he deals with other law enforcement officials’ approach to the drug issue. Franklin said he simply expresses his opinion and they either get it or they don’t.

He said there is not much difference between him and other officers, other than the amount of research they do regarding drug legalization. He said all police want to do good things, but some are just “misinformed” or “misguided.”

The presentation was hosted by SSDP, National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, the Black Student Union and Students for a Democratic Society.

estelle@umdbk.com

Comments

24 comments
Skeet
Tue Oct 13 2009 08:48
I disagree that all drugs should be legalized. This is mainly due to the fact that if they are legal, then we will undoubtedly begin to see advertisements for them, just like we see alcohol and tobacco ads (allbeit sparingly). There's something just not right about seeing an ad for heroin or cocaine on the side of a bus. Additionally many illegal drugs are synthetic, and therefore more harmful to the body than natural drugs (marijuana, mainly).

**Yes, heroin comes from a species of poppy, but u cant just make heroin out of the sap, and u cant just get powder cocaine from crushing a coca leaf so lets not go down that route, okay? **

Anywho, I'm mainly an advocate of marijuana legalization in particular because of the health benefits that come along with it. The only thing bad for u in marijuana is pretty much the combustion chemicals produced by burning matter, not the THC itself. if other drugs like cocaine, heroin, meth, etc could show some type of health benefit, I'd be for legalizing them, but those benefits are highly unlikely to materialize and legalizing ALL drugs would be detrimental to our society.

Sister Mary Thomas
Sun Oct 11 2009 12:02
Ugh, another stupid story by a bunch of stupid white people. I hope all the whites die.
Cynthia
Sun Oct 11 2009 12:01
Ugh, who cares. Most the people using drugs on this campus are white. If the whites want to kill themselves off, then fine by me. There are too many white people on this campus anyway.
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 13:59
Ron Paul was Right!!!
Your name
Thu Oct 1 2009 11:58
qew-Leland Hospital is not the Medical Examiner. The Medical Examiner stated Len Bias' death was the result of cocaine and obviously, yes being dumb as the previous poster pointed out was a contributing (or overwhelming) factor.
Qew
Wed Sep 30 2009 20:29
In regards to the death of Len Bias,
Leland Memorial Hospital in Riverdale, Maryland-
" cardiac arrhythmia related to usage of cocaine"

Related to, not caused by.

Your name
Wed Sep 30 2009 14:37
Cocaine's a hell of a drug.
Irina Alexander
Wed Sep 30 2009 13:45
Mike R.- I completely agree. A society in which we could just stop everyone from taking drugs would make things so much easier. Unfortunately, just like abstinence-only education, the "just say no" anti-drug campaign has only made things worse. We've been trying for years and years to scare people away from drugs, but it has simply failed. We can't control other people's actions, but we can provide them with reliable drug information and straightforward education.

The War on Drugs has been failing to do everything it was supposedly created for.
1) Crime has increased: We are making criminals out of people who need, like you said, treatment. After jail time, they lose their legitimate jobs and fall into a never-ending criminal cycle.
2) Illegal drugs are more accessible: Drug dealers don't check for identification. Kids have reported that it's much easier for them to track down illegal drugs than to buy alcohol or cigarettes.
3) Illegal drugs are more dangerous: Illegal drug prices are becoming cheaper and the drugs themselves are becoming more pure.
4) Drug abuse has not decreased: Those who have illegal drug abuse problems have a harder time receiving help. Billions of dollars a year are funneled into the drug war instead of our health care system. Drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not criminal.
5) Death toll has increased: The number of police officers and innocent citizens caught in the black market line of fire has skyrocketed. Drug cartels and gangs, just like during alcohol prohibition, are gaining more and more power. The demand for drugs will never end, and criminals are taking over by controlling the supply.

As you can see, our current system is doing much more harm than good. Check out http://www.leap.cc for more info or shoot an email to ssdpterps@gmail.com

-Irina Alexander
Pres, UMD SSDP

Your name
Wed Sep 30 2009 12:36
Steve, Cocaine didn't kill Len Bias. Len Bias being a dumbshit killed Len Bias.

The kind of guy that goes and does hard drugs after getting a multimillion dollar contract and can't even graduate taking bare minimum classes will inevitably do something stupid enough to get them killed. If Cocaine didn't get him killed, a drunken car crash or bar brawl would have soon enough.

Steve
Wed Sep 30 2009 11:23
Sorry to disappoint you, but Len Bias died of a cocaine overdose not an allergic reaction. Many of you may not even know who he was since he died in 1986, but he was one of the greatest U of MD basketball playes ever and had everything to live for including millions of dollars coming his way. So don't tell me cocaine isn't harmful.
Your name
Wed Sep 30 2009 09:39
regarding to the len bias comment,

len bias died because he had an allergic reaction to cocaine, not an overdose. The situation was a tragic and unfortunate one, but it was a direct result of his allergic reaction, not his overindulgence/abuse of cocaine that tragic night. People die from unknown allergic reactions all the time, doesn't mean that what they imbibed is deadly.

John Doe
Wed Sep 30 2009 01:48
Mike R I am replying to your response, the most retarded, idiotic, response I've ever read.

It should not be up to the government to control what I put into my body. It's not the governemnt's duty to regulate every aspect everyone's life. YOUR ignoring the basic IDEALS of this country. Stop living in your perfect world where everyone grows up to be doctors and professors and start living in the REAL world where people do drugs, everything from legal pharmaceuticals to illegal drugs. Drugs are here to stay for the better or worse, but punishing people for doing what they want when it hurts no one else is ludicrous. I'm sure you're the same kind of person who supports warrant less wiretapping on the grounds "if you have nothing to hide, you'll comply"

for fucks sake....

Mike R
Tue Sep 29 2009 23:13
All of the people arguing for legalization of these drugs conveniently ignore one simple fact- NOBODY should be taking these drugs in the first place! Taking marijuana or any other chemically-altering drug is not a "lifestyle choice"- it is a behavioral problem that is dangerous and addictive. Recovery often requires medical and psychological treatment, at the taxpayer's expense. It is are business, and the logic that "it would save money if we simply stopped enforcing the law" is just insane. People need to grow up and accept responsibility for the community as a whole.
Your name
Tue Sep 29 2009 22:58
"And those who claim legalization is a slippery slope to a drug-ridden country, use your brain. Did the 21st amendment turn everyone into an alchoholic? No"

Alcohol can't be compared to more addictive substances such as heroin or even cocaine. Use YOUR brain.

When Britain started selling opium to the Chinese they had a HUGE problem - high ranking officials were addicted/hooked and not completing their work, military officers used opium to encourage their men to fight (resulting in an extremely ineffective military force), etc. Allowing a drug to be free and legal has a lot of far-reaching effects. The war on drugs may be being fought the wrong way, but it shouldn't be ended completely, at least not in regards to some hard/seriously addictive substances.

When we live in society we are NOT free- we give up some of our liberties in exchange for safety, etc. A society in which people are given free reign to shoot up is one that will not function effectively and meet our needs.

Kenny
Tue Sep 29 2009 19:56
I find it disheartening that all of the arguments against the prohibition are purely pragmatic.

The drug war is harmful, ineffective, and a horrible idea, from a pragmatic standpoint, which anyone with a brain can notice.

But aren't we forgetting the most important thing? Liberty?! People have a right to do whatever does not infringe on the rights of others. Of course, certain situations caused by hard drug use would require restrictions to prevent other people from being hurt. (e.g. restrictions on dealing near schools) Taking drugs may hurt you, may even kill you, but that doesn't mean you don't have a right to do it. Does the government, realistically, have the capability to prevent self-harm and suicide? No.

Government-enforced morality takes the moral decisions out of the individual's hands. It's no longer a choice based on its moral merits and it becomes a choice based on whether you conform to the government's rules or not.

There ARE responsible drug users and there are irresponsible ones-and so long as they don't hurt others, they don't deserve to be punished. Not all drug users "can't deal with reality." Some of them just want to experience a diverse array of sensations, more than those available to the sober mind. Others just enjoy the introspective growth that drugs provide them with.

Addiction is a disease, not a crime. Treat it as such.

And those who claim legalization is a slippery slope to a drug-ridden country, use your brain. Did the 21st amendment turn everyone into an alchoholic? No. (But the 18th made crime rates skyrocket to record highs...) The more dangerous slippery slope, my friends, is fascism.

"[Let's say you want to take some LSD. Now what does LSD do to you? It affects your mind. Well, the government says that you can't take LSD. That means the government wants to control your mind, restrict your thoughts. I think anyone can agree that a country where the government has power over your mind is just about as far from 'The land of the Free' as you can get.]"

Steve
Tue Sep 29 2009 19:51
Two words all U of MD students who think cocaines is harmless need to remember:

LEN BIAS

Your name
Tue Sep 29 2009 17:21
Legalizing drugs will be the opening of the door to millions of Americans that were afraid to use drugs due to its criminalization. Think we have a problem now sheltering and rehabbing those that are hooked? And now we move the money on the "War on Drugs" to funding all this health care, not to mention more police staffing to deal with the crimes drug use is attached to (specifically theft). Haven't we already dumbed down society enough without the legalization of dangerous substances? Alcohol has done more than its share of damage to society - but you clowns want to increase the ability for people to engage in dangerous and reckless behavior? Drugs to treat illness and injury are great things. Drugs for "recreational use" is a sad and pathetic cop out for those that have a hard time dealing with reality and need to slip into fake states.
non-drug user
Tue Sep 29 2009 16:43
I don't think marijuana or any other drug will be legalized until the generation that dominates national legislation today has waned.
Justin Kander
Tue Sep 29 2009 13:18
I don't see how anybody who has listened to Franklin speak could disagree with legalizing all drugs. Every day, every single day, people get killed, civilians and officers alike, because of drug Prohibition, not because of drugs. So people say, "Oh, these drugs are bad, so let's keep them illegal, and it's okay to do this on a moral basis even if my family has to die for it." As Franklin says, death is just too final, and it's not worth it to enact these worthless policies that are completely wasteful and do not even achieve the gains they are supposed to make.

If drugs were legalized, demand would NOT skyrocket. People abstain from hard drugs because they are DANGEROUS, not because they are illegal. People think that others would go crazy if drugs were legalized, but if you ask them about their individual choices or the people they know, they say, "Well I know me and my friends wouldn't do these drugs if they were legal". So why do you think others would? People who believe in drug prohibition have no faith in humanity and think we are animals who would go crazy at the slightest chance to intoxicate ourselves. That may be the case for some individuals, but the vast majority of us have a lot of control. Also, by focusing on treatment instead of incarceration, you actually help addicts instead of destroying their lives. Honestly, I can't understand anymore why anybody would want to keep drugs illegal, at least if they know this information. The reasoning behind Prohibition is false, idealistic, and moralistic, but the one thing it is not is realistic.

Brian Peters
Tue Sep 29 2009 13:04
I agree with LEAP's mission absolutely - prohibition of all drugs must be repealed. Those who think it'll never go past marijuana - read the news. Mexico was not the first and it won't be the last country to decriminalize and hopefully legalise and regulate all recreational drugs right through to amphetamines, cocaine, and heroin.

I personally know quite a number of past and present cocaine (powder not crack) users - most of who would admit to being addicts, but they all continue to lead fairly normal lives, there's almost no impact of their work lives etc, and their work colleagues and family are often completely unaware. Chances are many people know several cocaine users and they're not aware of it.

I am NOT saying cocaine is a harmless drug - not by any stretch of the imagination – there’s long term health risks, it’s extremely addictive, costly etc. But when you assess the overall harm of the drug, much of that harm is a direct or indirect consequence of prohibition. The high cost, the potential for overdose, the impurities, the issues with seeking medical assistance in emergencies, the issues with seeking medical assistance overall, the issues related to dealing with criminals, and of course the very real risk of being caught, heavily fined or even incarcerated - and in all likelihood having your career destroyed and your family torn apart.

Then there is the crime, violence, corruption, terrorist funding and numerous other issues associated with drug production, trafficking, and dealing. And the horrendous financial and social cost of a futile war on drugs. Remove or minimise all those risks, and cocaine probably comes scarily close to alcohol, tobacco, and many abused prescription medications in terms of harm profile – both in terms of harm to users and harm to society. And I’d let someone who’s done a few lines drive a car long before I let someone who was drunk or stoned anywhere near the driver’s seat. Bear in mind, our perspectives are massively influenced by the current state of affairs, and by decades of government propaganda.

Once again, I’m not going in to bat for cocaine – it’s a dangerous and addictive drug and most people who use it wish they’d never started! I picked cocaine as an example here because many people rank this in the top 2-3 most dangerous illegal recreational drugs - perhaps fairly, but perhaps not. And yes I'm aware that the risks with crack are much higher again. However I believe that any and all arguments for drug legalization really apply even more to "hard drugs" than they do for "soft drugs" - and if you don't understand that - you're probably missing the real point. The potential for harm minimization and overall society benefit is much higher for the harder drugs. And the likelihood of cocaine use dramatically increasing if it was legalized and regulated is probably low and probably much lower than it is for marijuana.

Small steps of course - and it'll likely start with decriminalization and legalization of pot first. But if you want to be part of the overall solution not the problem, keep the end game in mind, open your mind to the bigger issues and the bigger picture here, which is at least as much about helping society (locally and globally) deal with the crime and violence issues, as it is in reducing drug consumption, harm minimization etc, the financial benefits etc, and not criminalizing a massive percentage of people across the globe for their recreational drug use.

There’s so much more at stake here than making it easier or safer for pot smokers to score - and pushing that agenda alone is likely to be counterproductive anyway, even for the legalization of pot cause.

Log in to be able to post comments.