Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Senators, students press officials

Farvardin, Wylie defend decisions as signs show trust in administration is “eroding”

Published: Thursday, November 12, 2009

Updated: Friday, November 13, 2009 00:11

provost

Matthew Creger

Students, faculty and staff grilled top administrators at a University Senate meeting yesterday, using the opportunity to voice concerns about the impact of budget cuts and to demand more input in the administrative process.

Provost Nariman Farvardin said he welcomes suggestions regarding cost-saving strategies and how to best distribute budget cuts. But several in attendance yesterday said there is a lack of transparency when it comes to financial matters and  that they cannot access the information necessary to give meaningful feedback.

"I can tell you that trust is eroding. And it doesn't have to do with the budget cuts per se," Vicky Foxworth, director of the Center for Leadership and Organizational Change, said at yesterday's meeting. "It has to do with the processes. They are not inclusive as you believe they are, as you want them to be, as you need them to be to keep this campus going the way you want it to go."

State budget cuts have piled up since the summer, forcing the university to trim $40 million from its coffers — in part by laying off staff, cutting programs and considering restructuring colleges.

Most recently, in what administrators insist was a budget-driven decision, the university removed Associate Provost for Equity and Diversity Cordell Black from his post, spurring student backlash that led to a 600-person protest on the mall last week.

Farvardin has said the university is committed to saving its most vital programs, but several who spoke expressed concern about the impact departmental cuts and mergers could have on academic quality.

"In my college, there is a lot of distress about diversity programs that really don't belong together being put together," said English professor Martha Nell Smith, referencing the possible merger of African American studies, American studies, women's studies and LGBT studies in the arts and humanities college.

Farvardin said there will always be those unhappy with the university's decisions.

"Ultimately, you have to return a certain portion of the budget back to the state," he said. "Something has to go. We have reached the point that any decision is painful now.

"We will have to use our collective wisdom," Farvardin added. "I don't think anybody in higher education can give you a benchmark as to how to do budget cuts, but I'm very open to receiving suggestions if they are good suggestions."

Many in attendance said they want to offer suggestions, but do not have the resources to make them nor the opportunities to present them.

Malcolm Harris, a student activist and Diamondback columnist, asked Farvardin and Vice President for Administrative Affairs Ann Wylie for specific budget documents that are not publicly accessible. Although the university's budget is available online, students have maintained the 900-page document is unintelligible and university administrators must be using other information to plan cuts.

Farvardin said he has provided his budget documents to his personal advisory committee that meets behind closed doors, but added he would try to make the information more widely available by posting it online.

More than 100 students crowded the senate meeting to engage in conversation and ask the provost about Black's removal, student involvement and the justification of cutting and consolidating "low-achieving" programs and departments.

Faculty also shared their concerns with the provost about Black's dismissal.

"I thought the very last thing cut would be the associate provost for equity and diversity," history professor Art Eckstein said.

Referring to Black as his friend, Farvardin emphasized the decision to remove Black was a "direct consequence of budget cuts." He said the move was necessary to protect the Nyumburu Cultural Center, the Office of Multi-ethnic Student Education and the Office of LGBT Equity — all departments Black oversees.

"It was a very difficult decision for me to make, and ultimately I decided it was my responsibility to try and fully protect the personnel and the services of those three offices that serve our students on a regular basis," Farvardin said.

Though the provost addressed some student concerns during the meeting, others said afterward they felt Farvardin largely ignored them.

"We had a number of questions he did not respond to," Community Roots  Co-President Jazz Lewis said. "Clearly, there's an issue because we're out here."

Farvardin said the student presence at the meeting was powerful, but added he was "disheartened" by what he called a misunderstanding of the situation.

cox at umdbk dot com, hampton at umdbk dot com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Sun Nov 15 2009 11:41
The issue appears to be trust. I would like to know from where this distrust has come.

However, rather than addressing this issue of trust, students now seem committed to pursuing the process of micromanaging the university. But, not committed enough to seek out the information required to make the decisions in question. Big fail. Here's a little FYI: the 900 page budget is what administrators use to make these critical decisions, in conjunction with the knowledge they accumulate through thoughtful discussion and reflection. Want to contribute an informed opinion? Try spending 15 years in the administration of UMD, becoming intimate with the people and institution to which your decisions are accountable.

Not interested in dedicating 15 years of your life to UMD? Try taking advantage of this opportunity: become a part of the discussion. *Hint, the discussion happens before decisions are made.

And, bigger fail: getting wrapped up in fruitless questioning that stymied the more time critical issue of the Wooded Hillock. It would be most helpful to maintain perspective on resources, time specifically.

Your name
Sat Nov 14 2009 21:15
malcolm harris is, as stated, a communist
Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 11:38
malcolm harris is, as stated, a columnist...meaning he writes opinion...meaning it isn't objective...shesh.
isthereanypossiblewayyoucouldbediverse
Fri Nov 13 2009 10:44
Actually, the number has always been reported around 600. If you do not believe in this cause, that's your business. The act of criticizing those who are fighting for a greater cause is menacing.
favardiniswhatdiversitylookslike
Fri Nov 13 2009 09:45
"Malcolm Harris, a student activist". Isn't this just code for a guy that can't get elected to a real position? Is it his mission now to follow Farvardin around and ask him the same questions time and time again in the ridiculous hope of catching him in a "gotcha" moment? And lastly, is this just his attempt to build status for more aspirations? How can you be a journalist AND objectively report on issues, by the way? I guess this is how the number of "protesters" continues to grow with each article.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In