Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Students find university budget confusing

SGA contest meets apathy

Published: Thursday, October 1, 2009

Updated: Friday, October 2, 2009 12:10

After students posted the university's 2010 fiscal year budget online last week, the SGA is hosting a competition meant to encourage students to participate in the debate over where their tuition dollars go.

Students, who can view the budget by visiting the Student Government Association's website, are being asked to submit examples of expenses they find absurd or confusing to SGAcommunications@gmail.com. The best submissions will be posted on the website every week, and the SGA hopes to present a list of student submissions to university administrators at the end of the semester.

So far, student participation has been low, in part because of the sheer size of the document.

"Eight hundred pages?" junior history major Danielle Levenfus balked. "I have homework to do!"

Some students said they are just too bogged down with classes and extracurricular to digest the huge amount of information in the university's budget.

"Honestly, I wouldn't look at it," sophomore Romney Makle said. "I don't have the time or the level of commitment."

Others think that the information available in the budget doesn't provide enough insight into administrators' motivations or justifications.

"Personally, I wouldn't look at it because numbers alone don't tell much of a story to me," junior Tam-Sanh Nguyen said. "Numbers can't say why [administrators] decided something needed that much money or if it's being used effectively."

A few students admitted they didn't even know the university was tackling budget cuts, despite university President Dan Mote's persistent stream of e-mails.

"I don't pay much attention to the campus news," junior elementary education major Steffi Chang said. "I didn't know the budget was online, so I don't think most people are really reading it."

SGA legislator Kenton Stalder, who originally downloaded the document from Hornbake Library for public distribution, said he did so to make it easier for students and faculty members to get involved in decisions about university spending.

"Obviously we have a lot of decisions that are going to be made down the line," Stalder said.  "We're hoping students can contribute creative solutions to some of the university's problems." 

SGA spokesman and former Diamondback staffer Joel Cohen said only about 10 to 15 students had submitted budget lines as of Wednesday, adding the SGA hadn't really advertised the competition outside of its Facebook group.

One of the few students to comment on the competition, Nate DeSelms, a junior computer science major, gave a "thumbs up" to a submission posted on Saturday: "Did you know your university budgeted $250,000 for the football team's food service this fiscal year?"

DeSelms, who said he joined SGA's Facebook group for "no special reason," said he liked the post because he thinks the university spends too much money on athletics. He added that he did not know that the SGA was hosting a competition.

"The focus on putting money toward athletics bothers me and scrutiny toward the budget can only benefit the university," DeSelms said.

Cohen said he expects most students to search the document for things of particular interest to them.

"The idea is that people will look at what they're interested in," Cohen said. "If you're a government and politics major, you might search for BSOS or the government and politics department. Or if you're a big athletics fan, you would look at that."

Although the PDF can be searched, lines are so specific that queries often turn up too many or no results. There is no table of contents or index, and the budget references ambiguous acronyms without providing a key.

For example, one submission made on Monday reads, "Did you know your Universitybudgeted $77,000 for ‘instructional' in the office of 350049 ASCDU? If you know what this office is or what they do, we want to know!"

Both Stalder and Cohen stressed that they hoped to take up the issue of the budget's readability with administrators. Cohen said the SGA plans to do so when representatives present the list of winning submissions at the end of the semester.

apino at umdbk dot com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments Log in to Comment

My Name
Wed Oct 7 2009 17:44
Andrew wrote "Unlike the University's budget, the SGA budget includes detailed reports of how the organization spends its money."

Do you honestly believe this Andrew? The University's budget has tons of details. Individual salaries. Postage and Mail. Printing. How is the SGA budget, with line items like "Contractual Services $10,000.00" more detailed?

I read your reply as passive-aggressive and generally meaningless.

The post by Terp was clearly meant to show that the posted SGA budget is no better or worse than the posted UMD budget. Both are easy for outsiders to pick at. Both have many details without a key.

studebt
Tue Oct 6 2009 15:01
is there a way to get previous years detailed budgets?
Andrew Steinberg
Tue Oct 6 2009 13:03
Dear Terp,

I appreciate your interest in the Student Government Association's budget. Unlike the University's budget, the SGA budget includes detailed reports of how the organization spends its money.

Anyone is welcome to come into the SGA accounts office (0209S in the Stamp Student Union) and see the ledgers of student organizations. Additionally, there are written records of the budget applications on file in the SGA office. I would be happy to arrange a time to review these with anyone who would like to see them.

I am always trying to make the SGA budget more user-friendly and welcome your suggestions. If you would like to discuss this matter further, or are interested in becoming involved with the SGA, I encourage you to come by the organization's office at 0209J in the Student Involvement Suite in the student union.

Andrew Steinberg
Vice President of Financial Affairs
Student Government Association

A Parent
Mon Oct 5 2009 17:38
Not a student or faculty, just a lowly parent. But... there is a reason the students find the budget unintelligible. It is!

It looks like the budget is still being done on punched cards! Was the background someone's idea of being cute, or is it really coming off a big old late 1970's mainframe style printer?

There is no context given. There is no table of contents. For instance, is it alphabetical? By main operating unit? Most important stuff first? Are the numbers for a particular organization up or down from the previous year? How do the expenditures relate to the school's strategic plans? Some graphics that show trends, along with a mapping to what are the university's priorities, and does the budget address them is in order. There are short titles and acronyms that make information fit on the printout, but mean nothing to the carbon units reading the budget.

In many cases, too much information is given, at too high a level of detail. 6 associate professors at $480K, 3 full professors at $312 K is sufficient. I don't need to know to the penny what Professor A, B, and C make. (Professor A may leave, and NewHire may come in at a different rate.)

Also, some departments may actually be money makers for the school. Is there a way for "overpaid" Professor A to get credit for bringing in the research dollars that fund new equipment, TA salaries, etc.?

In the age of the Internet, transparency, XML, etc. you would think that a University with a fine computer science department would figure out a way to publish its budget in a way where people could do analysis on it. Sort it by total expenses by department (the big stuff at the top); find all external contract/consultants; order by average salary; find departments that are money makers and money losers (again, who brings in the research bacon), etc....

How about a grand challenge for the computer science department? Parse the PDF, mark it up in XML, and design an application that allows a web user without a spreadsheet to do some analysis, and display key facts graphically. (You might even want to fund them to do this..... The insight they give you will help with next year's budget, which could be designed to better accomodate the online publication and analysis process.)

All that being said, I rather expect that with the big cutbacks going on, and my generation's STUPID refusal to pay more taxes and insistence on burdening the current students with debt, you are not going to find a lot of fat in the budget.

A Frustrated Parent
Sun Oct 4 2009 09:10
Now having trouble posting part 2 -- does a short post come in??
A Parent
Sun Oct 4 2009 09:04
Okay, so part one of my post...

Not a student or faculty, just a lowly parent. But... there is a reason the students find the budget unintelligible. It is!

It looks like the budget is still being done on punched cards! Was the background someone's idea of being cute, or is it really coming off a big old late 1970's mainframe style printer?

There is no context given. There is no table of contents. For instance, is it alphabetical? By main operating unit? Most important stuff first? Are the numbers for a particular organization up or down from the previous year? How do the expenditures relate to the school's strategic plans? Some graphics that show trends, along with a mapping to what are the university's priorities, and does the budget address them is in order. There are short titles and acronyms that make information fit on the printout, but mean nothing to the carbon units reading the budget.

In many cases, too much information is given, at too high a level of detail. 6 associate professors at $480K, 3 full professors at $312 K is sufficient. I don't need to know to the penny what Professor A, B, and C make. (Professor A may leave, and NewHire may come in at a different rate.)

A Parent
Sun Oct 4 2009 09:03
Test - have a thoughtful post on this, but having trouble posting it. If this gets posted, my thoughtful post is too long. Otherwise, there is a problem with the blogging software.
Joel Cohen
Sat Oct 3 2009 10:40
Yes, anyone can enter, including faculty.
Terp
Sat Oct 3 2009 10:34
The SGA budget is posted too. Let us play this game there as well.
Agape Campus Christian Fellowship for over $5k for renting a van on weekends? You could buy a used van for that.
American Indian Student Union for over $2k for mysterious "Services"?
Archery Club for over $2k for "Miscellaneous Supplies"?
FUEL Leadership Conference gets almost $3500? What are they? There's no key for the acronyms!
PublicAsian gets over $4700 for photocopies?
Asian Awareness gets $5k to bring in speakers?
Ballroom at Maryland gets $20k for a single event?

See how meaningless it is to just look at a budget from the outside? You see a lot of money being spent in ways that you don't understand after just a few pages and the above pays for one more employee not being let go. This was just flipping through the first 10% of the budget.

My Name
Fri Oct 2 2009 21:50
ASCDU = Academic Support for Maryland Athletics

Is the $77,000 being paid for private tutoring for student athletes?

Prof
Fri Oct 2 2009 21:47
Can faculty enter?

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In