Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Administration: A horror (slide)show

Published: Monday, October 26, 2009

Updated: Monday, October 26, 2009 00:10

I wish I could say our new "unstoppable" slogan was just one in a series of boneheaded mistakes made by an administration far out of touch with the rest of the university. I can't. The "Unstoppable Starts Here" slogan is part of a deliberate and calculated plan by administrators to distract campus stakeholders from the worsening budget crisis.

Anyone can make insinuations about conspiracy theories, but it's a little hard to believe that administrators without the sense to know that spending $250,000 on an energy drink slogan is a bad idea could even conspire to order lunch. Without explicit internal documents detailing a plan of distraction and obfuscation, my claims would be questionable at best. Luckily, Provost Nariman "Darth Vardin" Farvardin's slideshow presentation given at this year's deans' retreat has leaked, and it details exactly where the slogan fits into the larger plan.

The slideshow is a devastating document for any student, professor or university employee concerned about the university's future. In addition to celebrating drops in enrollment in the arts and humanities college, and the behavioral and social sciences college, the slideshow also mentioned a tuition increase for 2011.

Even with a tuition hike, furloughs and cuts to every department, the administration knows it won't be able to make ends meet. Their solutions are things like merging or closing "unproductive" departments and colleges, improving teacher efficiency and increasing reliance on private funders. In order to bring in some extra cash, the administration wants to grow the university's lucrative executive programs and start awarding online degrees. One moment we attend a first-rate public university, the next we're basically students at the University of Phoenix, except we have a football team.

Nowhere in the document is there any discussion of shared governance or working with the rest of us on solutions. How does the administration think they can get away with changing the basic character and fundamental goals of the university without even talking to the actual stakeholders? That's where the slogan comes in.

The last slide in the presentation has only two points, but they're incredibly revealing. The first is "Keep faculty and staff morale up." After painting a grimmer picture for the future of university teachers and staff with every slide, it's understandable that the provost is worried about their spirits.

The second point is "Manage public opinion and minimize negative publicity." The administration is less interested in keeping our school from collapsing than convincing everyone they have everything under control. They don't. I can't help but see the universally panned, dumbass slogan as part of this opinion "management." Our needs are different from the administration's. We need to solve a budget shortfall while maintaining educational quality — they need us not to notice that the crisis exists. Fortunately, we're not as distracted by shiny, meaningless phrases as they would have liked.

We cannot allow our opinions to be managed. Instead of turning the budget shortfalls into a political problem and provoking a state-wide discussion about the value of public education, the administration would rather sweep us and our vision for the university under the rug. If you don't believe me, go look at the slideshow at CPSdS.org. Think about whether you want to go to school at the university the provost describes. Ask whether you want to teach there or work there. Ask yourself if you'd want your kids to go there. The university is ours to fight for, and it won't protect itself.

Malcolm Harris is a senior English and government and politics major. He can be reached at harris at umdbk dot com.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Wed Oct 28 2009 18:56
"Columnists aren't allowed to comment on their stories. Sorry. "

That's just about the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

Your name
Tue Oct 27 2009 16:28
President Mote and administrators haven't been hiding this from us at all, from openly talking to the Diamondback about budget and program cuts to Motes' slews of e-mails announcing the specifics of furloughs. But hiding it to some extent IS important because the university doesn't want to scare people away...they need to give out a vibrant image to incoming students, that CANNOT be denied. Otherwise we will be in an even worse position, with students choosing other schools over us.

Both keeping their image and reputation up AND keeping educational quality up are important. Neither aspect can be ignored.

Your name
Tue Oct 27 2009 16:24
I both agree and disagree with a lot of things the Malcolm says. The university needs to be concerned with maintaining educational quality at all costs...offering online degrees/3 year bachelors programs/etc. will simply work against its goal of attracting brighter students/more prestige, though they may raise more money (in the long run this will hurt the university - maybe phase out such things after a time?). Keeping the faculty at the university and keeping the faculty teaching well is the main priority. Everything else can go by the wayside if this stays - which is why things like "keep faculty morale up" are actually important...but again, energy drink slogans and dumbing down the programs offered isn't the way to go at it.

What the solution is, I don't know, but I would've hoped an "activist" such as Malcolm would have had a better solution than little 'ol average me...I guess this is only proof that the university is scrambling for scraps because that's all they have. Even Malcolm has no solution. So maybe instead of attacking the university we can actually work together to achieve something meaningful. This is a hard time for the uni and it's not their fault that they are in the situation they are in. Cuts from the state have been absolutely enormous...how could that have been prevented? It couldn't have. Don't act like the people who work at this university don't want it to succeed...they have more vested interest in it than even we, the students, do.

Your name
Tue Oct 27 2009 12:21
Keep faculty and staff morale up!
Yeah! Good idea.

Keep threatening layoffs and more furloughs. That'll do it.

Official Diamondback Policy
Tue Oct 27 2009 02:07
Columnists aren't allowed to comment on their stories. Sorry.
please respond
Mon Oct 26 2009 23:59
what is malcom harris doing for university students besides complaining about things? i recognize that he ran for SGA president and lost; however, there are other avenues that he could work in if he believes that the university is being mismanaged. some of these, to name a few, are serving on a sga committee, serving on a university senate committee, and/or working constructively with leaders to solve problem (read: NOT insuting the provost by calling him Darth Vardin). apparently, he does not know the first thing about affectting change and working with other human beings (it's not that hard, it's called being POLITE; doing actual research also helps too). it seems that malcom harris only cares about publicity, for himself and for the other members of the now defunct Student Power Party. once i see him actually trying to do something and constructively work for change, then i can respect him. right now, he is just complaining. i have nothing against malcom harris personally, however, his methods are what i take issue with because they reflect poorly on the student population as a whole, including those who are actually trying to accomplish change.

and malcom, if you're reading this, i'd like a response.
toodles.

kevin barrett
Mon Oct 26 2009 21:54
It's listed as a CHALLENGE. The solutions are listed below. Typically, challenges are things meant to be bested, or circumvented. Seeing as all of the solutions are ways to save money, I'm going to have to say that they're attempting to find ways to avoid it.

Similarly, I'd hardly expect any large, bureaucratic, public institution to welcome negative opinion. I'm fairly certain that most businesses- and this university is certainly a business- have plans to minimize negative opinion. Doing so is great for the university; it increases enrollment and the average test scores of potential undergrads, fosters more research opportunities for professors by giving them an advantage in academic publications, and generates more revenue. Add in the budget crisis, and it's no surprise that a main goal is to minimize negative opinion.

Your name
Mon Oct 26 2009 17:28
Dude, on slide 39 it says "Increased Tuition" under FY11 Budget Challenges. That sounds like a plan to increase tuition. And if there's nothing wrong with it, why does it keep mentioning the attempts to minimize negative public opinion?
kevin barrett
Mon Oct 26 2009 16:38
This is a joke column, right? A highbrow farce? No?

I read your slideshow. It's nowhere near as damning as it is made out to be. In fact, the only questionable slide in the entire presentation is the one that paints increasing enrollment in certain departments as "failures." Of course, this is in no way celebratory, as written above. I've seen the online protests about BSOS being too crowded and underfunded; naturally, a sudden increase in enrollment will only exacerbate those problems, especially for a university concerned (rightly) with its own budget.

As for tuition increases? That's an outright lie. The closest there is to that is on slide 39, where "new revenue" is listed as a possible solution to budget problems. On the next slide, where "more targeted solutions" are listed, there is no mention of a tuition increase. In fact, the entire presentation reads as pretty favorable to students: the administration appears concerned with available programs; there is even mention of a "Global Studies" minor being created. It appears, to me at least, that this slideshow is much more indicative of an administration concerned with maintaining a respectable university on a budget than a university hell-bent on breaking the will of the common student, injecting the sciences into them, and calling them twice a year for donations until they die.

I look forward to your response, as I'm starting to get the feeling that the slideshow you wrote about and the one I read are not the same.

Your name
Mon Oct 26 2009 14:21
thank you malcolm harris
Your name
Mon Oct 26 2009 01:14
+1

De-funded starts here.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In