Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Guest column: 'Roman' times

Published: Monday, October 19, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 22:10

When did rape become negotiable and the legitimacy of sexual assault claims become a point of contention?

It seems like a ludicrous notion, but the prevalence of this pro-rape mentality becomes clear by observing the numerous and growing examples of rape denial, apologism and ignorance.

Last month, director and actor Roman Polanski was arrested for drugging and raping a 13-year-old child in 1977, a sentence he escaped for more than 30 years by fleeing the country. Seems like a no-brainer, right? He raped a child, fled the country, failed to pay his victim in an out-of-court settlement when she sued him in 1988 and denied his victim any justice for more than three decades. But 138 individuals in the film industry, including big names like Woody Allen and Martin Scorcese, signed a petition against his arrest. The media coverage focused on Polanski's experience as a Holocaust victim, which does not take away from the reality of his crime. The Feminist Majority Foundation, an otherwise laudable organization, discredited the importance of the incident because it happened many years ago and Polanski has had a tough life.

How do we settle sexual assault claims made against companies funded by government defense contracts? These companies control whether their employees can bring cases of sexual assault to court and may force victims to resolve their allegations only in private arbitration.

Jamie Leigh Jones, an employee of Halliburton/KBR in Baghdad was gang raped, locked in a shipping container and threatened with job loss if she reported the incident to her company in 2005. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) proposed an amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations Bill that would withhold defense contracts from companies that prohibit employees from reporting their sexual assaults and bringing their cases to court. A vote against this would essentially be a vote supporting rape, so who in their right mind would vote against this?

Oh, that's right, 30 senators — all who happen to be white, male Republicans. It is incredible to see this kind of victim-blaming among our elected officials in Congress, a place where legislators are increasingly willing to overlook grave human rights injustices to push their own agenda and political ideology.

Rape culture is cultivated when these things occur and people do not take sexual assault and violence seriously. One in six women and one in 33 men are sexually assaulted in their lifetime, and college-aged women are four times more likely to be assaulted, with 73 percent of victims knowing their assailants. We can no longer stand back idly while our elected officials, our celebrities whom we fund when we buy a movie ticket and our larger culture that we help define normalizes and excuses sexualized violence.

Find the contact information of the legislators who voted against Sen. Franken's amendment and let them know you do not support their actions. Support organizations that work with victims of sexual assault and violence. Have discussions with friends, family, professors and classmates about rape culture and the unacceptability of sexual assault.

As individuals helping to shape the future of our world, we have the power to emphasize that rape is always a crime and never negotiable.

Aliya Mann is a junior psychology major. She can be reached at amann12 at umd dot edu.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments Log in to Comment

Alex Trebeck
Fri Oct 23 2009 11:29
Blacks rape at a much higher percentage then whites. Those are true facts not racism. Deal with it
Your name
Thu Oct 22 2009 22:37
"A vote against this would essentially be a vote supporting rape, so who in their right mind would vote against this?"

nice and simple in your world. far more complex in the world of writing laws. not worth debating in a college newspaper comments section. goodbye.

Ash V
Wed Oct 21 2009 17:31
That is indeed a fact. Look up the site RepublicansforRape, it has a list with photos and phone numbers of the senators in question. They are all white and male, all the Republican women supported this amendment.
What does telling the truth or not have to do with voting for Obama?

It is sad to think that people would actually vote down this sensible amendment. Companies with such policies ignorant of sexual violence are disgusting and should not be supported by taxpayer dollars. Its an embarrassment that anyone would vote against an amendment to rightly deny these companies with immoral policies the right to gain government business. Unfortunately it seems that some people seem to be pursuing the worldly desire for greed rather than standing up for morality and human rights.

Your name
Wed Oct 21 2009 16:57
It's a fact and if you'd like to see where it was found look it up for yourself-- especially before making unfounded comments on someone else's honesty. It makes no difference who one voted for in the election, supporting a culture that is unsympathetic to rape victims is pathetic, regardless of partisanship.
Your name
Wed Oct 21 2009 13:41
"Oh, that’s right, 30 senators — all who happen to be white, male Republicans."

It like to see where you found this fact. Im guessing you voted for OBAMA

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In