College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Sexism in the workplace: No more boys' club

By Bethany Offutt

Print this article

Published: Monday, October 26, 2009

Updated: Monday, October 26, 2009

[Editor’s note: This is the second in a two-part column.]

Last week, we learned that sexism sucks, yet it is alive and well, thriving in the professional world. Outdated relics like unequal pay and the glass ceiling are evidence that women’s liberation hasn’t set anyone free yet.

We’ve all gotten the patronizing chuckles, the “little lady” comments, the limp fish handshake and the reflexive, condescending twitch of the lips. (This is always before they see our resumes.) But since you can’t walk around with your qualifications tattooed on your forehead, another response is required. We could take the feminist route and spit on any male brave — or stupid — enough to get within expectorating distance. But those assault charges could pile up and become pesky. We could take the docile route and stay locked up in our kitchens experimenting with meatloaf recipes. But that is done and over with and is now a prison of the past. Additionally, meatloaf is gross.

So what’s a girl to do?

Work hard. Be the first person in the office and the last to leave. Make sure your work is finished, your “I”s dotted, your “T”s crossed, before you flirt with the hot new tech guy. Dress to impress, choosing professionalism rather than sensuality. Spend more time preparing your notes for a big presentation than picking out your outfit.

Instead of looking up to Lady GaGa or the characters on Gossip Girl, model yourself after women like Maya Angelou, Eleanor Roosevelt, Sandra Day O’Connor and Oprah — women who made it to the top, who made a difference and whose legacies continue to do so.

Studies have shown that women are less likely to ask for raises and to maintain eye contact while speaking. This is unacceptably self-defeating, as both show a lack of confidence in self and performance. Don’t be afraid to let people know you can kick ass: Cool self-assurance is a handy tool no matter the circumstance.

The key to everything is balance. Be professional, but also be personable. There’s nothing wrong with being friendly, but don’t be the office bike. Girls who are make it harder for the rest of us.

At the end of the day, be someone who you can respect. Others will take the hint.
Sexism is a big deal, one that females and males need to work together to overcome and outdistance. It falls to our generation to erase centuries of discrimination and inequity. Are we up to the challenge? We’ll see.

People say chivalry is dead because women killed it. But that’s not what this is about. I’m not saying you can’t or shouldn’t open the door for me, watch your mouth when I’m around or pay on dates. I’m just saying you can’t tell me that I’m somehow a sub-standard excuse for a human being.

I’m tired of it. I’m tired of being looked down on, I’m tired of being condescended to, I’m tired of being treated as though I’m less, lacking and inferior. I’m not, and I know I’m not. Are you?

I think it’s time we showed the world.

Bethany Offutt is a sophomore criminology and criminal justice and psychology major. She can be reached at offutt at umdbk dot com.

Comments

13 comments
Steven Swann
Wed Nov 4 2009 13:47
(Full version of response printed 11/4/09)

Bethany Offutt’s “Sexism in the Workplace” columns feign advocacy for gender equality while investing in sexist ideology to degrade the women she seeks to “help”. We must do better.

Dredging up the hackneyed stereotypes of the “Raging Feminist” and describing the “Feminist Route” as indiscriminate spitting on men, the author evokes the sexist fallacy of feminism as an incompetent monolith of juvenile, man-hating wackos; blinded by anger and worthy of contempt. In truth, the continuum of feminism is rich with a diversity of theoretical viewpoints, goals and strategies. Poignantly, without their bumbling lot, Offutt wouldn’t have the opportunity to write columns that now shoot gender equality in the foot.

Mystifyingly, she then recommends that contemporary women emulate of pioneers like Maya Angelou, Eleanor Roosevelt, Sandra Day O’Connor & Oprah Winfrey, each of whose pioneering work (and often public campaigns) is animated by an essential feminism.

Offutt callously disparages the vital work that women do in the home and slanders homemakers as passive—both sexist trademarks. She also completely ignores the power and possibility of conscious choice. How dare we insult any parent as morally inferior for staying home to raise a child? Is parenthood suddenly less important than career advancement? For millennia, women have been confined with deprivation of choice, in deference to male dominance. Forcing women into the workplace to serve a false morality is no better than keeping them at home to serve male ambition. Equal valuation of, and choice in, the labor of men, women and families—regardless of venue—is a key component of gender equality.

Bethany, you, I, and other feminists (Yes you are. Embrace it.) are rightly angered by the injustice thrust upon you by sexism. But misplacing the responsibility for defeating sexism on women (while absolving men) echoes the victim blame leveled at women for everything from the wage gap to rape. Your article evinces a stark contradiction: unwittingly adopting the mythology of sexism and consciously combating its hurtful consequences. It’s heartbreaking to read the undercurrent of shame with which you regard womanhood. Exhorting your sisters that, “its time [they] showed the world” their worth, gushes the very “self-defeat” you decry. Scolding women to improve behaviors and “become” equal, denies that they have always been equal. Systemic discrimination is the failure of society to recognize the fundamental equality of people, not the failure of people to properly manifest or display their equality. It cannot be defeated with individual virtues; it demands societal solutions.

The black, lesbian, feminist author Audre Lord once said, “You cannot dismantle the master’s house with the master’s tools”. Bethany, you cannot defeat sexism by using sexism against women, to motivate them against sexism. It’s time for a new house and new tools. But you must realize your own equality before you can demand it from anyone else.

Raj
Sat Oct 31 2009 03:08
also women get less cause they dont have high paying work skills. I mean giving your boss a bj and getting him a sandwich doesn't require much brain power
Luke Rodinpooper
Thu Oct 29 2009 08:14
You guys are trying to hard. The reason that women get paid less is because they take off time when they are pregnant. Also, they suck at asking for raises and do not take risks in getting mgnt jobs. This isn't some boys club keeping women down. In fact, go to any big company and you will rise to the top quicker if you are a woman (or minority) then man.
Your name
Thu Oct 29 2009 00:36
you dot capital I and cross capital T?
Toni
Wed Oct 28 2009 09:06
The pay discrepancy for women is a result of the fact that women often come off as cold or unapproachable when they are working hard. People want to work with warm, friendly, easy going people.

I'm not saying ALL WOMEN do this, I'm just saying the super-hard tough workplace biotch is likely not to get as far as a friendly, confident well adjusted woman is.

Hypocrisy at its worst
Tue Oct 27 2009 22:36
"Make sure your work is finished, your “I”s dotted, your “T”s crossed, before you flirt with the hot new tech guy."

Right ... because flirting with coworkers is obviously the best way to be respected as a person and not sexually objectified in the workplace.

So sick of women saying crap like this. "Wah wah, women aren't respected. Now let's sleep around at work."

E. Garrison
Tue Oct 27 2009 20:42
Hey Bethany-

I think you are a sub-standard excuse for a human being.

Ty
Tue Oct 27 2009 13:56
Why is the diamondback sensoring posts?
Mike R
Tue Oct 27 2009 13:45
Once again the Diamondback refuses to show my posts. Do they enjoy censoring posters, or is their comment system just crap? I'm tending to lean towards the latter.

Regardless, I said it before, I'll say it again- stop with the mindless stereotypes of housewives and women who actually enjoy attracting men and give me a specific example of an executive at a corporation who is enforcing sexist work policies and getting away with it. For example, you could say "Fred Johnson, CEO of Foobar Incorporated, is demanding that the company gives %20 less pay to women working in the same administrative positions men do". That would be a real example and would give us something to discuss solutions for. Instead all we get is a bunch of BS statistics and philosophical pandering. Nobody is treating you like you are subhuman, lady! Get over yourself!

Mike R
Tue Oct 27 2009 13:38
Your failure to acknowledge that :

A. Not all housewives are ignorant, "docile" slaves

and

B. A significantly large group of women make it their primary business in life to look attractive and toy with men's emotions, perpetuating the stereotypes you're describing

show that we have yet another unfocused feminist spiel which blames the invisible "they" for an imaginary pandemic of social crises. Point out some NAMES, for Pete's sake. Don't give me some bullshit survey that says women are enslaved and they just don't realize it, last I checked they were making decisions in our courts, our police force, and in the White House. Give me a SPECIFIC COMPANY and a SPECIFIC EXECUTIVE that is being sexist and getting away with it, and we can talk about solving the problem! Right now we don't know what the heck you are talking about.

Your name
Tue Oct 27 2009 12:45
I think that the author needs some Midol and a Snickers bar.
Your name
Tue Oct 27 2009 12:39
"Make sure your work is finished ... before you flirt with the hot new tech guy."
Even flirting in the office AFTER finishing your work is not a wise career move.
And you're somehow assuming that women need to be told to finish their work, which would certainly explain those pay differentials .. if they really existed.
But mostly ... you're not even addressing the valid criticism about last week's column.
You may have dotted your i's but your opinions are not firmly grounded in reality.
Debi
Tue Oct 27 2009 10:33
WTF? Since when is "the feminist route" spitting on people? You speak up for gender equality while declaring yourself not a feminist. Last time I checked, feminism was aimed at getting equal rights and protections for women, and you are only weakening your case by distancing yourself from that. You should be ashamed by perpetuating the stereotype that a woman who wants gender equality is a raging harpy.

Log in to be able to post comments.