Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Friedgen's future uncertain

Athletics Department officials decline to comment on Friedgen's status for next season

Published: Monday, November 23, 2009

Updated: Monday, November 23, 2009 23:11

Friedgen

Adam Fried/The Diamondback

Mired in the worst of his nine seasons as Terrapin football head coach, Ralph Friedgen has declined to speak on his clouded future.

Several reports indicate the Athletics Department may be looking into the possibility of buying out the two years and reportedly $4 million remaining of Friedgen's contract. "I don't want to get into that," Friedgen said. "I want to keep the focus on Boston College right now."

Citing anonymous sources, The Washington Post reported Friedgen's buyout would not be a financial issue Sunday. But Friedgen's lawyer, Jack Reale, told The Post neither he nor his client have been in discussion with the Athletics Department about a buyout.

Numerous Athletics Department officials declined to comment on the situation. Reale was not reached by phone yesterday. Athletics Director Debbie Yow has repeatedly stated throughout the season she will evaluate Friedgen and the team after the season, as is the process with all sports. She will not comment until then.

Last February, after a controversy surrounding men's basketball coach Gary Williams and Senior Associate Athletics Director Kathleen Worthington, Yow offered Williams her "personal, full support," stating that Williams still had three-and-a-half years remaining on his contract, and she would discuss an extension when necessary.

In Friedgen's case, no such support has been lent.

The 62-year-old has taken the Terps (2-9, 1-6 ACC) to six bowl games. But this season is his fourth in six years with a losing record.

This past offseason, Friedgen and Yow named offensive coordinator James Franklin as the program's "coach-in-waiting," set to succeed Friedgen as head coach. Franklin's contract stipulates he will receive $1 million if he is not promoted by 2011. Still, at the time, Friedgen said he was uncertain of when he would retire. The possibility of being fired was not in the discussion.

"I'm going to coach as long as I feel like coaching and as long as it's enjoyable," Friedgen said in February. "James has been such a big part of our success here, and to me, it's kind of an honor and a legacy to have one of your coaches be able to follow you.

At the time, Yow described the move as a measure of "common sense," stressing the program's continuity.

ajoseph@umdbk.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

Dale
Tue Nov 24 2009 22:52
If Notre Dame can pay 18 million to get rid of 1 coach, the Terps could pay 5 million to get rid of two. Clean house and start fresh. That is a great, desirable coaching position. Getting a name who can coach and recruit should nmot be a problem.
Jerry
Tue Nov 24 2009 14:17
I'm very frustrated with Ralph's last 6 seasons, but as a UM alum, UM parent, and UM football and basketball season ticket holder, I think it would be foolish and unacceptable to fire Ralph and Franklin, and in so doing cost UM $5 million very valuable endowment dollars. Clearly, the youngsters on this year's team have improved a lot during the course of the season and will in all likelihood play better next Fall when some of the injuries heal. I believe that with 2, perhaps 3 pretty solid QBs now on the roster, Ralph would get a solid 8-4 type season out of the team next year. Why not simply let Ralph play out his remaining 2 years, get him some new assistants to do a better job on defense and in recruitment, save the $5 million, and see what happens?. Penn State was very smart I think in their decision to retain Joe Paterno after he had several tough seasons. They have just completed their second consecutive 10 win season and have a super (in some circles the #1 ranked) recruiting class coming in next season. Clearly he and his assistants have the program back on track and he can now leave on his own terms with the program doing well. Ralph should be given the same opportunity. Based on all of the budget cutting impacts that have hit UM during the past year or so, some are really drastic in nature, it would be totally unacceptable to me, a UM grad and supporter and MD taxpayer, to see my university to blow
$5 million endowment dollars like this. If UM opts to do this, UM had best never come back to me for endowment support, because I simply won't provide it anymore. I think it would be fiscally irresponsible to blow $5 million dollars this way. Just not acceptable. The UM Athletic Department and football fan base need to be adults for a change, and trust in a guy who can coach. They can scream and shout, blow off some steam, fill up the blogs with their criticisms, etc., if necessary, but show some reason with respect to this decision. Ralph clearly needs some recruiting help and probably needs a new secondary coach and perhaps a new defensive coordinator. Let's make that happen and save the $5 million. -- Jerry
pete
Tue Nov 24 2009 14:05
while it may be popular to dump a coach whose team might end up 2-10 this season, I certainly dont support borrowing from the University endowment to buy out the Fridge, which this article fails to mention as a possible means of financing a buyout, but is in the Wash Post story, as well as in the Baltimore Sun. Thankfully, it sounds that some of our Board of Regents membership agrees:

"A buyout of any sort - even in the form of a loan from the school's endowment - would raise questions in the current economic climate, said former U.S. Rep. Tom McMillen, a member of the Board of Regents, which governs the University System of Maryland."

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/terps/bal-sp.terpsfoot24nov24,0,5437494.story

Rich
Tue Nov 24 2009 13:48
I say pay the $5 million and get rid of them both!

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In